It seems like every week there’s a new start-up being introduced with the intention of disrupting the current model for last-mile delivery. But these innovators, and the barrels of Silicon Valley venture capital behind them, have had relatively little impact to date.
Last-mile urban delivery to retail outlets is still a mess.
Retailers sell goods from tens of thousands of suppliers, all of whom ship their goods separately – different products traveling on different trucks to the exact same destinations. Active online buyers see the same inefficiency: multiple packages arriving every day at different times and often from different carriers.
This will change drastically in the next 10–20 years, particularly in urban areas where, according to the United Nations, 70% of the world’s population will be living by 2050.
Supply chain partners that won’t collaborate will be forced to. Here’s an example.
On London’s Regent Street, the landlord recently dictated to its retail tenants that all inbound goods from suppliers must be staged at a single consolidation center outside the city’s congestion zone and, from there, delivered to stores by the landlord’s designated carrier – all on a single truck. Result: Fewer trucks on the road, less fuel, less money, faster and more precisely timed deliveries, and greater efficiency at the stores. Everyone benefits from this model, yet it took a mandate to make it happen.
Come 2040, this level of efficiency will be standard – but it will require close public/private collaboration. In future urban delivery models, local governments will become active and essential partners.
That’s where it gets sticky.
You see technology moves fast; government does not.
Technology is being developed to disrupt and replace tired urban delivery processes. But who is going to disrupt inefficient government bureaucracies, where plans that require street-level changes can get tangled for years in study groups and political wrangling?
Today, commercial delivery to urban areas is certainly impacted by local rules (road restrictions, speed limits, etc). But these rules don’t dictate delivery strategy as they will in the future, when different companies will need to adapt to agreed-upon processes – leveraging a supporting infrastructure that has yet to be built.
These are just a few examples where the future of urban retail store delivery will depend on close public/private sector collaboration.
Industry can innovate, but government must activate.
According to Matthias Winkenbach, of MIT’s Center for Transportation & Logistics, “We can build fancy models (for optimized city deliveries) but if policy makers and companies don’t understand them, they have no impact.”
In 20 years, actual routing of vehicles, manned or unmanned, will be managed by highly sophisticated truck routing software capable of assessing millions of variables and kicking out the most efficient delivery route in seconds. This will be the easy part as computing power continues to expand. The tough part, ironically, may be working with local governments to create the rules and infrastructure that enable new delivery models to flourish.